Through Refugee business , anti-India elements (in France as well) had money pouring through the roof-and it was used for insurgency, separatist movements in India.
France discriminates against Indians and is racist as well.

Look, who got rich in France (from 1980's to 2005), the ones who supported insurgeny, separatists movements in India. France closed its eyes for these individuals and groups' organized crimes, scandals, illegal activities. But when an individual Indian demanded the fruits of his/her labour due, or another right within French legislation, French used the world's most powerful microscope to deny the same.

Many groups (read anti-India) were 'Insiders' to the French administration.
The group-leaders were originally from or were allied to countries which were on the arc from where terrorism was exported to and encouraged in India.

They had easy, privileged access to France's Social Welfare and Social Security funds to prop-up, promote, and propagate killings, terrorism in India. The frauds are numerous to mention here.
French government would surely say 'we had no way of knowing about all these scandals'. How come France wanted to extradite (BBC news- on 25, 29 August, 2007) Mr. Manuel Noriega (ex-President of Panama) from USA to face charges of 'Money Laundering' in France.

He was accused of laundering some million $US, but that much is laundered everyday in France.
There are about 500,000 undocumented, illegal workers in Paris region, but they work regularly. That means many million€ for taxes, social security are not in the system, but stashed away, 'Parked' and are accessible to someone in the administration.

And do you believe Mr. Brice Hortefeux does not know what is going-on ?
It is from an administration which wanted to persecute Mr. Noriega (?)
Similar techniques packed in ever changing form-paper have been the means to achieve France's foreign policy objectives (1980's to date), without obvious, visible involvement of France.

Because now Refugee business is well exposed, France wants to project an image of a country which does not support export, financing of terrorism, but it did earlier. France is telling the old story, probably because the evidence against France has been destroyed or time statue has expired.

France is asking Indian immigrants for high quality of documents and proofs before they get their basic rights honored, but France is protecting the men, machine and mechanism which created a living hell in India before 11 Sep. 2001.

Hortefeux veut renforcer la lutte contre le travail illégal
http://www.rfi.fr/francais/actu/articles/091/article_54640.asp
Brice Hortefeux, ministre de l'Immigration, testant le nouveau visa bio.
Brice Hortefeux, ministre de l'Immigration, testant le nouveau visa biométrique au Consulat de France à Cotonou, le 21 juin dernier.

France has stringent controls since 2006 (to verify their antecedents, personal data) for Indians (for example) who did not use Refugee routes but obtained residence permit in France but otherwise. This 'Token response' is the result of 11 Sep. 2001, otherwise most likely French operations are either dormant, gone underground, hibernating, in cold storage for the moment, because the persons whom France wanted as Refugees were not checked that thoroughly.

If one belonged to a ‘proxy’ group according to French calculations, all he/she had to do was submit a used stinky ‘toilet paper’ as an Identity Card and French accepted it. (proxy group = anti India, separatists, terrorists from across the border and their business partners in Refugee, People Smuggling business)

For example if a person entered France from UAE (place his/her agent bought a visa for him/her in black market) and in his/her application for asylum wrote ‘I was tortured, persecuted in India’, the person was honored, rewarded and given Refugee Permit with lots of money.

But if an Indian who entered France from India directly and complained of real, verifiable ‘horrible life experiences’ in India, France refused him/her any help.

Through Refugee business , anti-India elements (in France as well) had money pouring through the roof-and which was used for insurgency, separatist movements in India.
(What was going on......?

What France has allowed so far. The naive would get the shaft again. The government would balance its policy (extreme permissiveness, negligence in the past) on the windpipe of naive persons. The proposal has been put forward by Thierry Mariani, an MP of the governing UMP party and a confidant of President Nicolas Sarkozy. They envisage possible DNA tests for applications for visas of more than three months;
where there was "serious doubt" birth or marriage certificates were genuine, (1) immigration officials could "propose" to applicants that they take, at their own expense, (2) a test to prove a biological link with other family members. (3)
An amendment authorising the move was adopted by a National Assembly commission; MPs will examine the government's immigration bill in its entirety next week. Among its aims is to impose tighter conditions for families seeking to enter France to join their relatives. (4)
Mr Mariani says DNA tests would be a "sure and rapid" way to address the problem of "documentary fraud". (5)A report this summer by a UMP senator, Adrien Gouteyron, said there was often doubt over the authenticity of papers in family applications for visas. (6) The senator claimed that in certain African countries such as Senegal, Ivory Coast and Togo, between 30% and 80% of birth and marriage certificates were forged. (7)